AbstractDuring the mid 18th century, the standard British Army issue weapon was the Brown Bess Musket. There are various accounts of the performance of this early form of firearm and its tactical deployment (e.g. Hanger 1816). Using a technical replica of the Brown Bess, range trials and computer modelling have been used to asses the weapon’s capabilities and likely performance. The research found the Brown Bess musket to be a lethal weapon at the ranges at which enemy was commonly engaged, so long as it was accurate enough to hit the target. A single shot fired at 150 yards could penetrate at least two soldiers, even if bone were hit. The armour of the day (shields of wood, leather and sometimes steel, and the layers of woollen clothing) was easily pierced by the shot. The shot was found to readily deform on impact with metal targets. The maximum range could extend to around 1200m, with 202m reached when fired horizontally.
The results of this experiment hinge on an assumption by the authors that the muzzle velocity of a Brown Bess was 1,500 feet per second. We don’t know for sure how powerful historical gunpowder was, or what the velocity of a musket ball was. But we have a reliable source. Benjamin Robins invented the ballistic pendulum in the early 18th century, and his book New Principles of Gunnery (1742) contains the results of his experiments. Robins calculated the velocity of a 1/12th pound ball fired from a .75 caliber musket (the same size as a Brown Bess). His results ranged between 1,600 and 1,700 feet per second. The authors’ assumed velocity of 1,500fps is therefore conservative.
Now here’s the most interesting part to me: the authors weren’t able to achieve a 1,500fps muzzle velocity with any of the three modern powders they tested. This flies in the face of the common assumption that modern gunpowder is more powerful than historical powder. Modern powder may be more chemically pure, but the power of gunpowder is linked to the size of the powder grains. Very fine grains burn fast and larger grains burn more slowly. The optimal grain size for maximum power depend on the size and strength of the barrel. The authors found that by mixing two types of modern powder together, the musket achieved a higher muzzle velocity. They posit that this is because each powder has its own pressure curve. Combing the powder combined the pressure curves, increasing the time that the bullet was under maximum pressure. Perhaps the impurities and inconsistent grain size in historical powders made them stronger, not weaker.
Like in the Graz tests, the maximum range was calculated mathematically, not actually tested.
2 thoughts on “Range, Power, Penetration, Velocity of a Brown Bess – Roberts, Brown, Hammett and Kingston”
The balls Robins used in his “musket” tests were nearly perfectly fitted to the bore diameter and he writes about having had some difficulty pounding them down the barrel with a hammer. He warns anyone wishing to replicate his tests that when he first conducted them using a standard musket barrel, they could only withstand a few shots before bursting. He writes that to continue with his tests, he had a barrel custom made for him whose wall thickness was equal to the bore diameter (i.e., the walls of the barrel he used were .75 inches thick). This means the barrel he used would have weighed something like 40 pounds. For these two reasons, I tend to suspect that the velocity measurements Robins reports were not typical of muzzle velocities achieved by Brown Bess muskets, especially ones firing military loads, where the ball diameter was typically 0.06 inches smaller than the bore diameter.
Brown bess circa1700,500 grain ball at 1200 fps muzzle energy 1600 ft lbs!
Modern nato round such as the sa80,63 grain ball ,3100 fps muzzle energy 1350 ft lbs.
Also worth noting the recoil of the brown bess,mass times veoocity, about 3 times that of modern assault rifle
The damage done by brown bess dall must have been horrendous no doubt penetrating 2 to 3 bodies at optimum range 50 to 100 yards.